The paper is devoted to generalizations of the Cencelj-Dranishnikov theorems relating extension properties of nilpotent CW complexes to their homology groups. Here are the main results of the paper: Theorem 0.1. Let L be a nilpotent CW complex and F the homotopy fiber of the inclusion i of L into its infinite symmetric product SP(L). If X is a metrizable space such that $XτK(H_{k}(L),k)$ for all k ≥ 1, then $XτK(π_{k}(F),k)$ and $XτK(π_{k}(L),k)$ for all k ≥ $. Theorem 0.2. Let X be a metrizable space such that dim(X) < ∞ or X ∈ ANR. Suppose L is a nilpotent CW complex. If XτSP(L), then XτL in the following cases: (a) H₁(L) is finitely generated. (b) H₁(L) is a torsion group.
2
Dostęp do pełnego tekstu na zewnętrznej witrynie WWW
A countable CW complex K is quasi-finite (as defined by A. Karasev) if for every finite subcomplex M of K there is a finite subcomplex e(M) such that any map f: A → M, where A is closed in a separable metric space X satisfying XτK, has an extension g: X → e(M). Levin's results imply that none of the Eilenberg-MacLane spaces K(G,2) is quasi-finite if G ≠ 0. In this paper we discuss quasi-finiteness of all Eilenberg-MacLane spaces. More generally, we deal with CW complexes with finitely many nonzero Postnikov invariants. Here are the main results of the paper: Theorem 0.1. Suppose K is a countable CW complex with finitely many nonzero Postnikov invariants. If π₁(K) is a locally finite group and K is quasi-finite, then K is acyclic. Theorem 0.2. Suppose K is a countable non-contractible CW complex with finitely many nonzero Postnikov invariants. If π₁(K) is nilpotent and K is quasi-finite, then K is extensionally equivalent to S¹.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.