PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2016 | 10 | 7-23
Tytuł artykułu

Urban Crime Distribution in Isparta (Turkey): A Location Quotient Analysis

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
PL
Urban Crime Distribution in Isparta (Turkey): A Location Quotient Analysis
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Crime is an inseparable part of society and for the fact that place, time and society are inextricably interwoven implies that the conceptualization of the spatial aspect of crime is imperative. By adopting crime pattern and social disorganization theories, while using neighborhoods as the unit of analysis, we examined how crime behavior varies in an urban context. This was achieved by using Location Quotient of Crime (LQC) to identify and represent robbery, assault and threat agglomerations, as well as neighborhood in risk areas. The result of our analysis suggest that most neighborhoods had a relatively higher LQC for robbery, assault and threat crimes as compared to the city as a whole with quite a significant proportion of assault incidence in neighborhoods located near educational facilities. This paper also shows the usefulness of LQC in understanding crime behavior pattern at a micro level. A strong linkage between robbery, assault and threat crime incidents and key land use types were also established.
PL
Crime is an inseparable part of society and for the fact that place, time and society are inextricably interwoven implies that the conceptualization of the spatial aspect of crime is imperative. By adopting crime pattern and social disorganization theories, while using neighborhoods as the unit of analysis, we examined how crime behavior varies in an urban context. This was achieved by using Location Quotient of Crime (LQC) to identify and represent robbery, assault and threat agglomerations, as well as neighborhood in risk areas. The result of our analysis suggest that most neighborhoods had a relatively higher LQC for robbery, assault and threat crimes as compared to the city as a whole with quite a significant proportion of assault incidence in neighborhoods located near educational facilities. This paper also shows the usefulness of LQC in understanding crime behavior pattern at a micro level. A strong linkage between robbery, assault and threat crime incidents and key land use types were also established.
Rocznik
Tom
10
Strony
7-23
Opis fizyczny
Daty
wydano
2016-12-30
Bibliografia
  • Aliağaoğlu, A. (2007). Balıkesir Şehrinde Suçlar: Coğrafi Bir Yaklaşım. Ankara: Detay Yay.
  • Anderson, E. (1990). Streetwise: race, class, and change in an urban community. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Andresen, M.A. (2007). Location Quotients, Ambient Populations, and the Spatial Analysis of Crime in Vancouver, Canada. Environment and Planning A, 39(10) 2423–2444.
  • Andresen, M.A., Wuschke, K., Kinney, J.B., Brantingham, P.J., & Brantingham, P.L. (2009). Cartograms, Crime and Location Quotients. Crime Patterns and Analysis, 2(1), 31–46.
  • Anselin, L., Cohen, J., Cook, D., Gorr, W. and Tita, G. (2000). Spatial Analyses of Crime. In: D. Duffee (ed.), Measurement and Analysis of Crime and Justice, Criminal Justice 2000: Volume 4. . Washington DC: National Institute of Justice, pp. 213–262.
  • Becker, G.S. (1968). Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2): 169–217.
  • Boba, R. (2013). Crime analysis and crime mapping (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sag.
  • Bowers, K.J. & Johnson, S.D. (2004). Who commits near repeats? A test of the Boosts explanation. Western Criminology Review, 5 (3), 12–24.
  • Brantingham, P.J., and Brantingham, P.L. (1981). Notes on the geometry of crime. In: P.J. Brantingham and P.L. Brantingham (eds.), Environmental Criminology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 27–54.
  • Brantingham, P.J., and Brantingham, P.L. (1984). Patterns in Crime. New York: Macmillan.
  • Brantingham, P.L., Brantingham, P.J., (1995), Location Quotients and Crime Hot Spots in the City. In: Block, C.R., Dabdoub, M., and Fregly, S. (eds.), Crime Analysis through Computer Mapping. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum, pp. 129–149.
  • Burgess, E. (1925). The Growth of the City. In: R. Park (ed.), The City. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 47–62.
  • Bursik, R.J. (1988). Social Disorganization and Theories of Crime and Delinquency: Problems and Prospects. Criminology, 26(4), 519–552.
  • Byrne, J.M., and Sampson, R.J. (1986). Key Issues in the Social Ecology of Crime. Research in Criminology, 1–22.
  • Cohen, L.E., and Felson, M. (1979). Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activities Approach. American Sociology Review, 44(4), 588–608.
  • Eck, J.E., Chainey, S., Cameron, J.G., Lietner, M., and Wilson, R.E. (2005). Mapping Crime: Understanding Hotspots. Washington DC: National Institute of Justice.
  • Eck, J.E., and Weisburd, D.L. (2015). Crime Places in Crime Theory. Crime and Place: Crime Prevention Studies, 4, pp. 1–33.
  • Groff, E., & McEwen, J.T. (2005). Disaggregating the Journey to Homicide. In: F. Wang (ed.), Geographic Information Systems and Crime Analysis. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing, pp. 60–83.
  • Harries, K.D. (1980). Crime and the environment. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas.
  • Harries, K. (1999). Mapping crime: principal and practice. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice Research, Office of Justice Programs, US Department of Justice.
  • Herbert, D.T. (1982). The Geography of Urban Crime. Harlow: Longman.
  • Hirschfield, A., &. Bowers, K.J. (1997). The development of a social, demographic and land use profiler for areas of high crime. British Journal of Criminology, 37(1), 108–121.
  • Homans, G.C. (1961). Social Behaviour: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.
  • Isard, W., Azis, I.J., Drennan, M.P., Miller, R.E., Saltzman, S. and Thorbecke E. (1998). Methods of Interregional and Regional Analysis. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
  • Karakas, C., Genckaya, O., Togan, S. and Karadag, R. (2014). Sustainable Governance Indicators: 2014 Turkey Report, Bertelsmann Stiftung.
  • Keles, R. (2001). Sustainable urbanization and its policy implications. The case of Turkey. In: D. Camarda, L. Grassin (eds.), Interdependency between agriculture and urbanization: Conflicts on sustainable use of soil and water. Bari: CIHEAM, p. 119–135.
  • Kikuchi, G. and Desmond, S.A. (2010). A Longitudinal Analysis of Neighborhood Crime Rates using Latent Growth Curve Modeling. Sociological Perspective, 53 (1), 127–149.
  • Klosterman, R.E., Brail, R.K., and Bossard, E.G. (1993). Spreadsheet Models for Urban and Regional Analysis. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
  • Mayhew, H. (1968 [1862]). London Labour and the London Poor. Volume IV: Those That Will Not Work, Comprising Prostitutes, Thieves, Swindlers and Beggars. New York, NY: Dover Publications.
  • McCarthy, T. & Ratcliffe, J. (2005). Garbage in, garbage out: geocoding accuracy and spatial analysis of crime. In: F. Wang (ed.), Geographic Information Systems and Crime Analysis. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
  • Murray, A.T., McGuffog, I., Western, J.S., & Mullins, P. (2001). Exploratory spatial data analysis techniques for examining urban crime. British Journal of Criminology, 41(2), 309–329.
  • Nolan, J.J. (2004). Establishing the statistical relationship between population size and UCR crime rate: Its impact and implications. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32(6), pp. 547–555.
  • Oberwittler, D.C. & Wikström, P.H., (2009). Why small is Better: Advancing the Study of the Role of Behavioral Contexts in Crime Causation. In: D. Weisburd, W. Bernasco, G.J.N. Bruinsma (eds.), Putting Crime in its Place: Units of Analysis in Geographic Criminology. New York: Springer, pp. 35–59.
  • O’Brien, L. (1992). Introducing Quantitative Geography: Measurement, Methods and Generalized Linear Models. London: Routledge.
  • Olligschlaeger, A. (2003). Future Directions in Crime Mapping. In: M.R. Leipnik & D.P. Albert (eds.), GIS in law enforcement: Implementation issues and case studies. New York: Taylor & Francis, pp. 103–109.
  • Openshaw, S., (1991). Developing appropriate spatial analysis methods for GIS. In: D. Maguire, M.F. Goodchild, and D. Rhind (eds.), Geographical Information Systems: Principles and Application, Vol. 1. London: Longman, pp. 389–402.
  • Quetelet, M.A. (1842). A Treatise on Man. Edinburgh: William and Robert Chambers.
  • Pfeiffer, D.U. (1996). Issues related to handling of spatial data. Australian Veterinary Association Second Pan Pacific Veterinary Conference, pp. 83–105.
  • Plint, T. (1851). Crime in England. London: Charles Gilpin.
  • Roman, C.G. (2005). The Routine Activities of Youth and Neighborhood Violence: Spatial Modeling of Place, Time and Crime. In: F. Wang (ed.), Geographic Information Systems and Crime Analysis. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing, pp. 393–310.
  • Rossmo, D.K. & Laverty, I., and Moore, B. (2005). Geographic Profiling for Serial Crime Investigation. In: F. Wang (ed.), Geographic Information Systems and Crime Analysis. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
  • Shaw, C.R. and Mckay, H.D. (1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas: a study of rates of delinquencies in relation to differential characteristics of local communities in American cities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Sampson, R.J. and Groves, B.W. (1989). Community Structure and Crime: Testing Social-Disorganization Theory. American Journal of Sociology 94: 774–802.
  • Sargin, S., Temurçın K. (2010). Crimes and Crime Dispersion in Urban Areas in Turkey. Bulletin of Geography Socio–Economic Series 12: 60–76.
  • Thrift, N. (2003). Space: the Fundamental Stuff of Human Geography. In: S.L. Holloway, S.P. Rice and G. Valentine (eds.), Key Concepts in Geography, London: Sage, pp. 95–107.
  • Tobler, W.R. (1970). A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region. Economic Geography, 46, pp. 234–240.
  • Townsley, M. (2009). Spatial Autocorrelation, and Impacts on Criminology. Geographical: Analysis, 41, pp. 452–461.
  • Turkish Ministry of Environment and Urbanization (2014). Turkey Habitat III: National Report. Turkish Ministry of Environment and Urbanization, Ankara–Turkey.
  • Unwin, D.J. (1981). Introductory Spatial Analysis. London: Methuen.
  • Weisburd, D., Bernasco, W., and Bruinsma, G. (2009). Putting crime in its place: units of analysis in geographic criminology. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Yılmaz, A. ve Günay Ergün, S. (2006). Türkiye’de Şehir Asayiş Suçları: Dağılışı ve Başlıca Özellikleri. In: Milli Eğitim Eğitim ve Sosyal Bilimler Derg. Ankara, 170, pp. 230.
  • Zhang, H. and Peterson, M.P. (2007). A Spatial Analysis of Neighborhood Crime in Omaha, Nebraska using Alternative Measures of Crime Rates. Internet Journal of Criminology.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ojs-issn-2449-9056-year-2016-volume-10-article-4431
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.