Czasopismo
Tytuł artykułu
Autorzy
Treść / Zawartość
Pełne teksty:
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Three variants of Kurt Gödel's ontological argument, proposed by Dana Scott, C. Anthony Anderson and Melvin Fitting, are encoded and rigorously assessed on the computer. In contrast to Scott's version of Gödel's argument the two variants contributed by Anderson and Fitting avoid modal collapse. Although they appear quite different on a cursory reading they are in fact closely related. This has been revealed in the computer-supported formal analysis presented in this article. Key to our formal analysis is the utilization of suitably adapted notions of (modal) ultrafilters, and a careful distinction between extensions and intensions of positive properties.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Numer
Opis fizyczny
Daty
wydano
2020-06-30
Twórcy
autor
autor
Bibliografia
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_18778_0138-0680_2020_08