Copper and manganese acquisition in maize (Zea maysL) under different P and K fertilization

• Autorzy: Renata Gaj , Krzysztof Bąk , Anna Budka
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper demonstrates the influence of different mineral fertilization with phosphorus and potassium on the concentration of copper (Cu) and manganese (Mn) in the ear leaf of maize at the stage of flowering (BBCH 65) as well as the contents and accumulation of the nutrients studied in maize when fully ripe (BBCH 89). A single factor experiment was carried out in 5-year-cycle (2007-2011), in the randomized complete block design. The experiment was conducted as a part of a long-term stationary trial. The investigation comprised 8 different P and K treatments: the absolute control, exclusive of one of the main nutrients (P - WPN or K - WKN), reduced amount of phosphorus and potassium (to 25% - W25 and to 50% WP50, WK50) as well as recommended amounts of basic nutrients (NPKMg - W100 and NP*KMg, P* - P* as PAPR - W100 PAPR). Evaluation of the nutriational status, performed in the ear leaf of maize at flowering stage, showed that regardless of fertilization treatment applied, the concentration of copper was lower than normative values, whereas that of manganese ranged within the optimal scope. At the same time, there was found a significant relationship between the grain yield obtained and acquisition of both copper and manganese by maize at flowering stage (stronger for manganese, r = 0.614). The total accumulation of copper and manganese in fully ripe maize was significantly differentiated as a result of mineral fertilization. The total uptake of Cu and Mn was reduced under the conditions of 10-year lack of P fertilization. Uptake reduction was considerably more advanced when K fertilization was absent for 10 years. Regardless of the experimental factor effects, more than 50% of the total copper uptake was accumulated in grain, whereas the majority of manganese was accumulated in maize leaves (50-64% of the total uptake). Correlation analysis showed a significant relationship between maize grain yield and the total accumulation of copper, whereas that of manganese was observed only in 3 of 8 treatments tested (WPN, WP50 and W100 as PAPR).

Słowa kluczowe

EN

micronutrient uptake; grain harvest index; unit uptake

• Wydawca: De Gruyter Open
• Czasopismo: Biometrical Letters
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: 53
• Numer: 1
• Strony: 21-36

Daty

wydano

2016-06-01

online

2016-06-08

Twórcy

autor

Renata Gaj

• Katedra Chemii Rolnej i Biogeochemii Środowiska, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu, Wojska Polskiego 71F, 60-625 Poznań, Poland

autor

Krzysztof Bąk

• Poldanor SA, Dworcowa 25, 77-320 Przechlewo, Poland

autor

Anna Budka

• Katedra Metod Matematycznych i Statystycznych, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu, Wojska Polskiego 28, 60-637 Poznań, Poland

Bibliografia

• Bąk K., Gaj R. (2016): The effect of differentiated phosphorus and potassium fertilization on maize grain yield and plant nutritional status at the critical growth stage. J. Elem. 21(2): 337-348.
• Bąk K, Gaj R., Budka A. (2016): Accumulation of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in mature maize under variable rates of mineral fertilization. Fragm. Agron. 33(1): 7-19.
• Bierman P.M., Rosen C.J. (1994): Phosphate and trace metal availability from sewage-sludge incinerator ash. J. Environ. Qual. 23: 822-830.[Crossref]
• Chalmers A.G., Sinclair A.H., Carver M. (1999): Nutrients other than nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (NPK) for cereals. HGCA Res. Rev. 41 London.
• Fageria N.K, Baligar V.V., Clark R.B. (2002): Micronutrients in crop production. Adv. Agron. 77: 185-268.[Crossref]
• Fageria N.K, Baligar V.V. (2005): Enhancing nitrogen use efficiency in crop plants. Adv. Agron. 88: 97-185.[WoS][Crossref]
• Fageria N.K., Baligar V.C., Li Y.C. (2008): The role of nutrient efficient plants in improving crop yields in the twenty first century. J. Plant Nutr. 31(6): 1121-1157. DOI:1080/01904160802116068.[WoS][Crossref]
• Feil B., Moser S.B., Jampatong S. (2005): Mineral composition of the grains of tropical maize varieties as affected by pre-anthesis drought and rate of nitrogen fertilization. Crop Sci. 45: 516-523.[Crossref]
• Gaj R., Przybył J., Górski D., Rębarz K. (2013): The effect of different phosphorus and potassium fertilization on the content and uptake of microelements (Zn, Cu, Mn) by winter triticale. II Uptake of nutrients. Zesz. Nauk Roln. Wrocław Seria Rolnictwo 104: 19-26
• Grusak M., Pearson J.N., Martentes E. (1999): The physiology of micronutrient homeostasis in field crops. Field Crops Res. 60: 41-56.
• Hänsch R., Mendel R.R. (2009): Physiological functions of mineral micronutrients (Cu, Zn, Mn, Fe, Ni, Mo, B, Cl). Current Option in Plant Biology 12: 259-266.[WoS]
• Jiang W.Z. (2006): Mn use efficiency in different wheat cultivars. Environ. Experimental Botany 57: 41-50.[Crossref]
• Li B.Y., Zhou D.M., Cang L., Zhang H.L., Fan X.H., Qin S.W. (2007): Soil micronutrient availability to crops as affected by long-term inorganic and organic fertilizer applications. Soil & Tillage Res. 96: 166-173.[WoS][Crossref]
• Li B.Y., Huang S.M., Wei M.B, Zhang H.L., Shen A.L., Xu J.M.m, Ruan X.L. (2010): Dynamics of soil and grain micronutrients as affected by long-term fertilization in an aquic incptisol. Pedosphere 20(6): 725-735.[Crossref][WoS]
• Lipiński W. (2013): Zasobność gleb Polski w mikroelementy. Studia i Raporty IUNGPIB 34(8): 121-131.
• Mahler R.L., Li G.C., Wattenbarger D.W. (1992): Manganese relationshps in spring wheat and spring barley production in Northern Idaho. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 23: 1671-1692.[Crossref]
• Marschner, H. (1995): Mineral nutrition in higher plants. Academic Press, London.
• Mortvedt J.J. (1994): Needs for controlled availability micronutrient fertilizers. Fertil. Res. 38: 213-221.
• Person J.N., Rengle Z. (1994): Distribution, remobilization of Zn and Mn during grain development in wheat. J. Exp. Bot. 45: 1829-1835.[Crossref]
• Person J.N., Rengle Z. (1995): Uptake and distribution of 65Zn and 54Mn in wheat grown at sufficient and deficient levels of Zn and Mn. I. During vegetative growth. J. Exp. Bot. 46: 833-839.[Crossref]
• Schulte E., Kelling K. (2000): Plant Analysis: a diagnostic tool. University of Wisconsin-Madison. Available online at:
• Quzounidou G., Ciamporova M., Moustakas M., Karataglis S. 1995. Responses of maize (Zea mays L.) plants to copper stress, growth, mineral content and ultrastructure of roots. Environ. Exp. Bot. V. 35(2): 163-176.
• Van Campen D.R., Glahn R.P. (1999): Micronutrient bioavailability techniques: accuracy, problems and limitations. Field Crops Res. 60: 93-113.
• Wei X.R., Hao M.D., Shao M.G., Gale W. (2006): Changes in soil properties and availability of soil micronutrients after 18 years of cropping and fertilization. Soil Till. Res. 91: 120-130.
• Xia HY., Zhao JH., Sun JH., Xue YF., Eagling T., Bao XG., Zhang FS., Li L. (2013): Maize grain concentrations and above-ground shoot acquisition of micronutrients as affected by intercropping with turnip, faba bean, chickpea, and soybean. Sci China Life Sci. 56: 823-834, DOI: 10.10007/s11427-013-4524-y.[WoS][Crossref]
• Zhang R., Guo Y.X., Nan C.Q. (2004): Study of trace elements of wheat grain in different fertili treatments. Acta Bot. Boreal. Occident. Sin. 24: 125-129.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1515/bile-2016-0002