EN
We investigate, in set theory without the Axiom of Choice 𝖠𝖢, the set-theoretic strength of the statement
Q(n): For every infinite set X, the Tychonoff product $2^{X}$, where 2 = {0,1} has the discrete topology, is n-compact,
where n = 2,3,4,5 (definitions are given in Section 1).
We establish the following results:
(1) For n = 3,4,5, Q(n) is, in 𝖹𝖥 (Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory minus 𝖠𝖢), equivalent to the Boolean Prime Ideal Theorem 𝖡𝖯𝖨, whereas
(2) Q(2) is strictly weaker than 𝖡𝖯𝖨 in 𝖹𝖥𝖠 set theory (Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory with the Axiom of Extensionality weakened in order to allow atoms).
This settles the open problem in Tachtsis (2012) on the relation of Q(n), n = 2,3,4,5, to 𝖡𝖯𝖨.