ArticleOriginal scientific text

Title

Arithmetic progressions in sumsets

Authors 1

Affiliations

  1. Mathematical Institute, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Pf. 127, H-1364 Hungary

Abstract

1. Introduction. Let A,B ⊂ [1,N] be sets of integers, |A|=|B|=cN. Bourgain [2] proved that A+B always contains an arithmetic progression of length exp(logN)1/3-ε. Our aim is to show that this is not very far from the best possible. Theorem 1. Let ε be a positive number. For every prime p > p₀(ε) there is a symmetric set A of residues mod p such that |A| > (1//2-ε)p and A + A contains no arithmetic progression of length (1.1)} exp(logp)2/3+ε. A set of residues can be used to get a set of integers in an obvious way. Observe that the 1/2 in the theorem is optimal: if |A|>p//2, then A+A contains every residue. Acknowledgement. I profited much from discussions with E. Szemerédi; he directed my attention to this problem and to Bourgain's paper.

Bibliography

  1. A. C. Berry, The accuracy of the Gaussian approximation to the sum of independent variables, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 49 (1941), 122-136.
  2. J. Bourgain, On arithmetic progressions in sums of sets of integers, in: A Tribute to Paul Erdős (A. Baker, B. Bollobás, A. Hajnal, eds.), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge 1990, 105-109.
  3. C. G. Esseen, Fourier analysis of distribution functions. A mathematical study of the Laplace-Gaussian law, Acta Math. 77 (1945), 1-125.
  4. I. Z. Ruzsa, Essential components, Proc. London Math. Soc. 54 (1987), 38-56.
Pages:
191-202
Main language of publication
English
Received
1991-01-30
Published
1991
Exact and natural sciences